Hillary Clinton's camp claims that since it won California, and a few other big states (by concentrating on them) she should be the Democratic nominee because she won the big states.
Unfortunately for her though, California has flipped .
If Florida, where no one campaigned so they were stuck, like CA, in a mire of dumb information from TV news services and a crowded field gets votes seated according to their illegal primary, and Michigan of all places gets theirs seated when Hillary, like Saddam, was the only viable candidate on the ticket then we should get a do over. We are having a vote in early June already set up from our old deal settler primary day. We could do it then, because public opinion in California has changed from the ill informed votes of Super Tuesday.
Excerpt US News report linked above:
On Super Tuesday, Clinton won the Golden State's primary by a margin of 52-to-43, surprising political experts with her dominance among Latinos, women, and older voters, in particular. Obama seemed to be unable to break through this electoral firewall. But in a new survey of more than 2,000 California voters, released today by the Public Policy Institute of California, an independent research group based in San Francisco, Obama appears to have experienced a significant bump since then. Over a month after voting in the primary, more Democrats here now say they have a positive view of Obama than of Clinton (78 percent to 74 percent)—a shift, experts say, that may be even larger than it appears, since much of Obama's support in the primary came from independents. Decline-to-state voters, who represent a sizable voting block in California, continue to flock to his campaign (57 percent have a favorable view of Obama, compared with 47 percent for McCain and only 35 percent for Clinton). Overall, more than 6 in 10 voters of all political stripes say they view Obama favorably, compared with 45 percent for Clinton. If the general election were held today, the poll indicates that Obama, not Clinton, would do better here: He polls at 49-to-40 percent over McCain, while Clinton-McCain is a statistical tie (46 percent of voters say they would support Clinton; 43 percent for McCain).
So, I don't know guys, but if you want to start changing rules to suit the corporations and fat cats backing Hillary, I think we can figure out some more rules to change to suit the majority of Democraticn leaning voters.
Whaddya say?
tags: hillary clinton barack obama 2008 presidential primary
links: digg this del.icio.us technorati reddit