Some Democracy. It sounds more like the old Soviet Union.
See LA Times blog Babylon and Beyond: Snakes, spiders and temptation
And note how the writers after reporting the facts focus on titillating and scary aspect of the bans and dangers they saw posted at Al Asad Air Base:
the entry-point into Iraq for thousands of troops, U.S. government employees, and employees of U.S. contractors from a dozen or more countries.
Mainstream news just keeps dishing it up to us unattached bloggers. How can they blame us if we take a bite?
Banned in Iraq (from the piece linked above):
near the exit is a very large sign telling of the behaviors that are prohibited at Al Asad. Among them: photography, gambling, defacing national treasures, selling currency, religious proselytizing, adopting wild animals as pets, souvenir hunting, and visiting the sleeping quarters of the opposite sex.
PS. I made a comment at the blog saying much of the same as here re: banning photography and democracy.
BTW, obviously photographs are being taken in Iraq. The Soldier's Media Center has their stock of propaganda pictures coming out, and the AP, Reuters, AFP and other news media obviously have been given rights to take photographs as long as none are embarrassing to the Iraqi government or US military. I see some other photographs at flickr.com taken by troops, not under the control of SMC. Well, you can't catch everyone.
I don't know how long ago that anti-photography law was adopted, but I used to find pictures at photo sites of all kinds of Iraqi scenes. Now you search on Iraq and get only military offerings. So apparently to Iraqis and other people without approval, this rule has bite. Images are close to the richest form of communication. Banning widespread rights to create them is a really bad sign.