According to the Minneapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune piece "
Taxpayers off the hook for GOP convention lawsuits " the liability for police brutality claims stemming from action around the Republican National Convention will be covered by RNC provided "insurance" (probably bought with pocket change by Exxon-Mobile is my guess). The report was careful to state that the liability deal was divergent from standard practice by other major party convention cities in the recent past.
This is interesting in that some activists (who were at Denver too) have noted new tactics being used to intimidate the press as well as protesters (at the end of the video above is one instance).
Transcript from near end of video above:
Man driving car (unidentified, looks like a lawyer, c. 10:45 into clip): "This is not just because the St Paul police decided to go do something.....Or maybe at the the Ramsey County convergence center... ....This is something coming from elsewhere.... It's very coordinated.... It's very studied....It's very orderly...and it's um.... It's Kafkaesque".
Also note that veteran journalists like those at Democracy Now have been caught up in the unreasonable demands and mindlessly bullying police actions.
So there is something happening at the RNC and it's not police action as usual even from the recent Democratic convention.
I thought the initial report above was curious and was going to write that the city should assume responsibility for the police problems because only the people who can control the police (either by direct vote on the superintendent or by voting in a new mayor -- though that didn't work in L.A.) should be held responsible for the money.
But you have this sharp lawyer type guy (quoted above) and the "Eye Witness Video" activists saying this is something new, from elsewhere. Savvy press folk and veteran protesters don't know how to keep from being beaten by police.
As the city of St. Paul heads into one last day of convention hoopla -- and one final day of protests -- state civil liberties leaders have accused St. Paul police of making many improper arrests and in some cases, provoking more problems.
"I think some of the police on the street have been very aggressive physically," said Charles Samuelson, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Minnesota. "The phrase is 'spoiling for a fight.'"
Um, in LA, even under police chief William (Guiliani man) Bratton, the official term ended up as "police riot" (the city actually adopted that name for the action of officers in MacArthur Park on May 1 2007 which were initially identified as having sufficient cause) Then again maybe the intense coordination of what is happening around the protests in St. Paul. negates the actual 'riot' name. I guess we'll have to call it police state.
Thank the Republicans, folks.
A Denver Police spokesman says in the report linked immediately above that no 'felony riot' charges were file in Denver. We know from Democracy Now's September 2nd show that felony riot charges were passed out like kleenex, in at least in the demonstration held on Monday.
If you listened to or read the transcript from the September 2nd "Democracy Now" you know that their experienced journalists with press passes weighing down their necks and camera at hand (for one of them) were charged with felony riot for no more than not being able to move out of the way fast enough.
This is Republican control and it's telling.
The reason that democracies don't need police state tactics is that they must keep the electorate reasonably happy. They might have demonstrations or even riots, but when a nation starts with police tactics you know which way they are going. They can declare any economic problems for the middle class as a 'mental recession' and say the people have become 'a nation of whiners' and problems are solved, because, as in China, demonstrations bring heavy repercussions.
tags: republican convention police state st paul demonstrations rnc
links: digg this del.icio.us technorati reddit